"Maybe 5or6 megapixel digital camera, 135 film equals to"We often heard and listened to such the review or a sales promotion for digital cameras . To say the fact, I had no interest in photograph until a few years ago, I didn't know in practice how resolution a camera film has.
Having been bored with digital camera, (digital camera photography don't need the skill so much, mastering PC imaging aside.) I began to use film cameras. I have no film scanner, but I got to substitute digital cameras for a film scanner. And I found negative film have far more performance than what digital camera promoters had said.
This film is Kodak PORTRA160.(135 negative film) Lens ; Cosina Zeiss PLANAR *T 50mm
Can you see the black rectangle line? This area became to the next image.
This image's resolution is far better than a common flat head scanner. This image has less area than one hundredth of original. One line equals to 2 pixels. This image seize is 487×328, and depending on lines in the image. Perhaps this image maybe equals to 200,000pixels.
In conclusion, This trial shows 35mm negative film's resolution estimated 20 megapixels or more over. .
Left image is a set for microscope digital photo made by myself. (Nikon Pronea Lens and Canon S95, light box, anti-newton ring acrylic plate, so on)
I didn't know how small detail a film can capture. When I knew the real performance of negative film, it was due to be dismissed in any place I went. And now digital camera are getting superiority of the resolution to a film.
*************************************************************************:****
This blog is not always camera topics. Perhaps camera topics are few in usual. My interests and aptitudes mainly are based on a cultural science or philosophy. Miscellany about Politics will sometimes be uploaded..
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment